The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances and various sentencing conditions revealed in the reasons for sentencing, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable, and thus, cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, taking into account the following as a whole: (a) new circumstances or special changes in circumstances that may be reflected in the sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment do not appear; (b) the Defendant planned intrusion theft by using the key to workplace prior to entering the workplace; and (c) circumstances and records

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.