logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고단2347
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B are the former worker's staff members. The defendant and the victim B are the former worker's staff members.

1. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of Sep. 27, 2013, in the vicinity of the Yong-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, to enter into a contract for the supply of lighting fixtures to the victim “. In order to receive such contract, the Defendant may receive a contract for the lending of KRW 10 million as the deposit needs to be deposited and return it.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was scheduled to use KRW 10 million from the damaged party as entertainment expenses, not from the above contract deposit, and the Defendant failed to secure lighting equipment that can be supplied to the Hawn, and even if he borrowed KRW 10 million from the damaged party due to the problems such as bills, there was no intention or ability to complete payment.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 10 million to the passbook (Account Number C) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On October 31, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime on October 31, 2013: (a) at the place described in paragraph (1) around October 31, 2013, “No prospect exists for lighting business; and (b) is scheduled to operate a business producing furniture with Aluminium.”

If a business plan is submitted to the Youth Academy in Ansansan, it shall be subsidized with KRW 100 million, but it shall be repaid with a loan of KRW 20 million under the name of deposit.

“A false statement” was made.

However, on April 2013, Defendant did not submit a business plan to the Korea Youth Academy, and Defendant planned to use the above money as living expenses, etc. due to economic difficulties at the time. Thus, even if Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to complete payment.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 20 million to one bank passbook (Account Number E) in the name of the same day from the victim.

1. 1.0 1.0 Daz. 2016

arrow