1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. Plaintiff A and B each KRW 10,000,000 for each of them and their related thereto from April 12, 2015 to November 2, 2015.

1. On April 11, 2015, Defendant E (F) of the basic facts: (a) on the ground that the Plaintiff C was taking a female-friendly job offering K of Defendant E on the alley-gu J apartment-gu, Daegu on April 11, 2015, Defendant E (FF) was in the course of, or took part in, Plaintiff C’s coaches and face, hair, hair, knee and snee, and buck; and (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff C was taking a female-friendly job offering of Defendant E, Defendant E, along with G, H, and I, when the Plaintiff C’s kne, kne, kne, kne, and bucks, etc.,

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant harmful act.” The Plaintiff C suffered from the accounts of the B/L branch, and was diagnosed of stress disorder due to the aforementioned harmful act by Defendant E, etc.

Plaintiff

C received KRW 20,000,000 from the parents of G for the purpose of treatment and criminal agreement, and KRW 5,000,000 from the parents of I for the purpose of treatment and criminal agreement, and received KRW 4,00,000 from the parents of H for the purpose of criminal agreement.

Defendant E, due to the above harmful act against Plaintiff C, received an expulsion from the M High School School Violence Countermeasures Self-Governing Committee held on May 6, 2015, and on September 2, 2015, Defendant E received a protective order of “nive custody entrustment for guardians and 40 hours lecture attendance order, 160 hours community service order, short-term probation, and 8 hours special education order for N of the guardian’s mother” under the Daegu Family Court Decision 2015No1367.

Plaintiff

A and B are the parents of Plaintiff C, and Defendant D is the father of Defendant E.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 5, 7 evidence, Eul evidence 11-1 through 3, Eul evidence 1-5, Eul evidence 2-1 through 3, Eul evidence 2-4, fact-finding inquiry results of this court's Mhigh Schools, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. According to the facts of recognition as above, Defendant E is the perpetrator of the instant harmful act against Plaintiff C, and Defendant D is the person with parental authority who is obligated to protect and supervise Defendant E, and is jointly with Defendant E’s Plaintiff C.