1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 40,942,001 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from November 3, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

1. The Plaintiff’s claim (1) 32,239,900 won (the Plaintiff stated that it was KRW 32,309,000 in the warden, but it is obvious that it is an error) based on the PinZg 371 sheet in the name of “D” and supplied the machinery of KRW 8,702,10 on July 2016, the fact that the Plaintiff, who manufactured and sold the machinery of KRW 8,702,101 in the name of “C”, was ordered by the Defendant to manufacture and supply the vessel parts under the name of “D”, does not conflict between the parties.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 40,942,001 won (32,239,900 won) and damages for delay.

(2) The Plaintiff asserted that even on June 2016, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the machinery of 412,470 won. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 1 only, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. As to the defendant's defense, since the defendant had suffered losses by supplying defective goods that the plaintiff delayed the delivery date, the defendant cannot pay the price until the correction of the defect or must deduct the amount equivalent to the amount of the damages. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the above fact, and it is not acceptable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above KRW 40,942,001 as well as damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from November 3, 2016 to the date following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.