A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 1991, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months in Seoul Eastern District Court for larceny, etc. and was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in Seoul Central District Court on February 16, 1993. On February 4, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months in Seoul Central District Court on October 4, 201.

On April 17, 2013, around 06:30 on April 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened the above restaurant in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and opened the restaurant, with a cash of 150,000 won owned by the victim and stolen the property, from that time until August 17, 2013, the Defendant habitually stolen the property worth KRW 3,592,00,000, total market value of the victims, as shown in the list of crimes, from that time, until August 17, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each written statement of D, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. On-site identification reports, investigation reports, investigation reports (in the case of the appearance of a suspect taken from CCTVs), investigation reports (related to the appearance of a suspect), investigation reports (in the case of the appearance of a suspect taken from CCTVs), investigation reports (CCTV and search reports), investigation reports (in the case of on-site conditions, etc.), investigation reports (in the case of on-site conditions, etc.), investigation reports (in the case of

9. Confirmation of market price of thief products, investigation report (No. 10. Confirmation of market price of thief products);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each on-site photograph, photograph of seized articles, and photograph of crimes;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (any criminal suspect A thief and attachment of judgment), two copies of judgment;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned and organized manner in the judgment;

1. Article 5-4(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Criminal Act comprehensively covering the relevant Article of the Act on the Criminal Crimes and the choice of punishment.