logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고단122
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2016, Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years at the Seoul Central District Court on July 1, 2016, and the decision became final and conclusive on July 29, 2016. On June 29, 2016, Incheon District Court sentenced Defendant C to three years of suspended execution for two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. and became final and conclusive on July 7, 2016.

[2] Defendant A is running a cosmetic sales business with the trade name of G, and Defendant C is a space between Defendant C and Defendant H (V, 63 years old) who is the leading owner and Defendant C, knowing that it was around March 201.

1. On December 7, 2013, Defendant A filed a patent application for the technology for manufacturing cosmetics using the 500 million accelerator stem cell distribution amount with the victim introduced through the cosmetic outer cosmetic on the first day and second day of December 2013.

I cosmetics produced by using the technology are sold in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J Burial.

The results of the purchase and use are 150,000 won, and the sales are supplied to 90,000 won per cost."

Defendant

A When the injured party refuses the above proposal, at the G office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around the 7th day of the same month, “I cosmetic 1 90,000 won is required to produce the above product, but if the injured party lends 500,000 won to the injured party, the product was manufactured, and then sold within 10,000 won per 10,000 won per 10,000 won, along with the interest of KRW 50,000 won per 10,000 won.

C. The above product was purchased and sold in a large quantity. The Chinese total sales contract was concluded in the amount of KRW 600 million. Of the down payment, this part of the facts charged refers to the Defendant A and C’s false statement that “Defendant C paid KRW 400 million as down payment of the Chinese total sales contract” to the victim. However, according to H’s testimony and prosecutor’s statement, the above Defendants at the time were “the down payment of KRW 200 million as down payment.”

arrow