The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged was from around 2013 to the Defendant: (a) from around 2013, the Defendant loaned money to the women engaged in entertainment business while running a usual credit business at an influent place; and (b) provided that it is difficult for them to refund money, the Defendant introduced women to sexual traffic business establishments located in Japan or Canada.

A person who intends to engage in credit business in violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Financial Users shall register for each place of business in the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, Special Self-Governing City Mayor,

On February 2014, the Defendant loaned KRW 500,000 to B for each 30-day interest on the condition that he/she shall receive 10% of the principal at a non-permanent and non-permanent place, Daejeon (Seoul) and run a credit business without registering it with the competent authority from around the date of February 2013 to February 2014, on condition that C shall receive 10% of the principal for each 10-day interest on the condition that he/she shall receive 10% of the remainder of the principal when he/she pays a part of the principal within 10-day interest, or that he/she shall receive 10 million interest on the remainder when he/she pays a part of the principal within 10-day interest.

B. On March 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) introduced money to the E'E' commercial sex acts establishments in Japan, which had been managed by the Defendant D, at the commercial coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

From that time until July 2015, the Defendant introduced C a commercial sex acts business establishment through five times in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

C. The defendant violating the Fair Collection of Claims Act.

It is a debt collector against C who prepared a notarial deed stating that C shall pay 50 million won to the defendant on the date of 2015, when C has given money to C and has not repaid it.

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant is C-do F in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do.