A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-five years.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] Around May 2006, the Defendant married with D, a two-dimensional dynamics of the victim C (n, 33 years of age) around 2006. Around September 2012, the Defendant was living together with the head, the mother, and the victim, etc. in the wife in the Hasung-si E (hereinafter “instant housing”).

The Defendant, from the ordinary victim, heard from time to time, and disregarded that “I wish to do so, if I expect that I will live in dynamics due to the same gueste, I would like to see that I would like to refuse to do so.” The Defendant saw that there was a complaint against the victim.

On January 2013, the defendant, after retired from an auto-scrapping company, has been urged to demand that the wife D pay living expenses under the circumstances in which the income is not specified, even though he/she acted as a franchise for auto-scrapping.

On May 2013, the Defendant agreed to provide passenger cars owned by the victim as security without the victim’s permission between the Habman F and the Habman F of the parts of the automobile and borrowed KRW 13 million.

On May 28, 2013, the Defendant received 6 million won from F first, and the remainder of 7 million won was transferred to F by June 1, 2013.

However, as the delivery of a security-based bents car was delayed, the creditor F was urged to perform the obligation to provide several collateral from the creditor F, and the defendant promised to reduce the loan amount to KRW 12 million to F in June 24, 2013 and transfer the said bents car to F in June 24, 2013.

On the other hand, around June 2013, the victim and D have seriously infringed upon the distribution of the premium due to the temporary disposition that was jointly operated, and on June 26, 2013, the above D discussed the complaint related to the premium to the defendant, who is the husband, on the new wall.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Between 10:30 on June 26, 2013 and 11:00 on June 26, 2013, the Defendant is deemed to have his wife D, one million won out of the premium received by the victim’s room of the instant house, who was disposing of the said premium to the victim.