beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 39,525,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 29, 2014 to June 11, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 15, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to lease the Plaintiff’s barge owned by the Plaintiff (B; hereinafter “instant barge”) in Busan Port to the Defendant (the monthly rent of KRW 12 months, monthly rent of KRW 8,250,000 on the above contract, shall be KRW 9,900,000,000,000 between the parties, or KRW 99,000,000,000 between the parties (the monthly rent of KRW 10,000,000 for the total rent of 12 months), and the monthly rent of KRW 8,250,00
(2) The court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below's determination that the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the plaintiff's ground of appeal and did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the appeal.
2. The plaintiff's claim, the defendant's argument, and the judgment
A. (1) Under the contract of this case, the Defendant shall bear all the expenses incurred in the return to the port and port of the ship and deliver the instant barge to Busan port. However, the Plaintiff’s failure to perform this shall be eight million won (8 million won) from March 15, 2014 to March 15, 2014.
5. up to 31. 31. 22,80,000 won of damages equivalent to the rent for the instant barge (4) the Plaintiff incurred in managing the instant barge. 5.4 million won.