logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.24 2013고정782
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the facts charged was that the police officer reported to 112 and sent out among the neighbors who had the wall between the defendant's house and the victim's house were disputing the victim's house entrance door due to noise, etc. which open and close the victim's house door door.

On February 4, 2013, at around 21:50 on February 21, 2013, the Defendant, in front of the Defendant’s house No. 301, Dong Dong-dong, Kim Jong-si, Kimhae-si, expressed the victim’s “in accordance with the law” to the victim, on the ground that two police officers dispatched to the above place and the police officers in charge of women’s management attend the place are biased.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that B, the victim of the instant indictment, withdrawn the Defendant’s complaint on June 21, 2013, which is the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow