1. The defendant is among the 15-story apartment complexes of the D apartment E-dong reinforced concrete structure built by the plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the plaintiff concluded a lease contract with regard to the apartment as stated in Eul (Death on May 27, 2017) and paragraph (1) of the Disposition Nos. 95,00,000, and the period from February 3, 2017 to March 2, 2018, and thereafter, he paid the above deposit KRW 95,00,000 to Eul, and resided in the above apartment after delivery. The above apartment was destroyed by the bathing room and damaged, and the plaintiff demanded repair, but left the above apartment, and the plaintiff was left there until now. The plaintiff asserted the termination of the above lease contract before the expiration of the lease contract, and the inheritor's refusal to inherit or contact after the death of the heir, and thus, the defendant was appointed as an administrator of inherited property, respectively, at the latest after the expiration of the lease contract.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff KRW 95,00,000,000, along with the receipt of the above apartment from the Plaintiff.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.