1. All the claims of the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor are dismissed.

2. Of the litigation costs, the Plaintiff and the Defendant incurred.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 7, 2013, at around 10:47, the Plaintiff driven the B Orala (hereinafter “Plaintiff Orala”) along three-lanes in the direction of Daejeon in the direction of Daejeon.

In order to overtake any F Twiter driven by E in the same lane (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant-motor vehicle”), the Plaintiff went to the four-lane, as follows: (a) tried to enter the three-lane, and (b) tried to enter the three-lane, and (c) the shock absorption facility of the way to go to the front wheels of the Plaintiff Orababa, and (d) at that time, the two-lanes go to the rear wheels of the Defendant-motor vehicle in the three-lane course.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the pelvis-gu and the laverization of the front and rear pelvis-gu, both sides, due to the instant accident.

G

B. The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement for the defendant vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-9 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff argued by the parties that the plaintiff Orala followed the defendant's vehicle, which the plaintiff Orala followed.

G, which was divided into a horn, and after the Defendant’s vehicle, notified E that the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven away without delay, and E is clearly aware that the Plaintiff is going to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle for overtaking the Defendant’s vehicle, in violation of the duty of care to safely operate the vehicle immediately before the Plaintiff enters the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby making the Plaintiff go to the right side and caused the instant accident, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident as the mutual aid business operator of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As to this, the defendant is the plaintiff.