1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to further determination of the argument that the defendant emphasizes as the main reason for appeal by this court in paragraph (2) below.

[Attachment] Article 7 of the first instance court's second sentence "69,151,549 won" and "69,701,549 won" shall be read as "69,701,549 won."

2. The defendant's argument on the plaintiff's additional assertion argues that although the plaintiff supplied a window necessary for the new construction of the second floor house located in D, but there were defects in the product and the additional construction took place, damage equivalent to KRW 15 million was incurred. Since the plaintiff supplied products different from the defendant's original decoration at the construction site located in Pyeongtaek-si and Kuju-si, and the construction was delayed, the plaintiff did not receive an amount equivalent to KRW 4 million from the owner of the building, the plaintiff is liable to compensate for each of the above damages.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the entries and images of the evidence Nos. 1 to 3 have caused each of the above damages claimed by the defendant, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be accepted for reasons.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.