beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 1,744,596 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from June 16, 2018 to June 19, 2019.
Reasons
1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.
At the time of the accident, the insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff vehicle") shall be the insured vehicle.
Defendant-backed vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant-paid vehicle”).
C On April 6, 2018, around 08:56, April 6, 2018, the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government flag tunnel (the road shape is attached to the road of the accident site) and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments, as shown in attached Form 2, in the course of bypassing the defendant vehicle, as part of the left side of the vehicle of the defendant vehicle in the process of bypassing the vehicle by the defendant vehicle, such as the degree of the collision in attached Form 2, the sum of KRW 5,815,320 paid insurance money by June 15, 2018, there is no dispute over the payment of the right side part of the vehicle.
2. Determination
A. According to the evidence above, the driver of the Plaintiff vehicle and the Defendant vehicle driver’s fault ratio: (a) the Defendant vehicle’s driver confirmed the existence of another vehicle at the margin until the right-hand is completed; and (b) even if the Defendant vehicle had a duty of care to prevent contact with the vehicle, the vehicle’s failure to perform such duty was the cause of the instant accident.
I would like to say.
However, according to Gap evidence No. 6's video, the accident of this case occurred due to negligence that the defendant's vehicle's vehicle's driver did not enter the right side of the plaintiff's vehicle in the direction near the left side of the defendant's vehicle, where the vehicle first arrived at the two-lanes of the accident site of this case, and the location of the plaintiff's vehicle is late later, and the left side part of the defendant's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle is included in the direction side of the right side of the plaintiff's vehicle, and the accident of this case occurred. The accident of this case occurred due to negligence that the defendant's vehicle's driver enters the right side of the vehicle of this case by neglecting his duty of care until the right side is completed.