logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단3602 (1)
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 2009 to January 28, 2013, the Defendant operated a used car dealer with the trade name “G” in the said FF Motor Vehicle Trading Complex.

The Defendant, while returning the successful used cars from the vehicle auction company to consumers, changed the odometer by using the fact that it is impossible for consumers to check the odometer of the vehicle from auction, and instead, did not notify such fact and sold the odometer to consumers as if the odometer is a vehicle with normal mileage.

1. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall alter the odometer of an automobile;

On January 13, 2009, at the office of “H” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul FF Motor Vehicle Trading Complex, the Defendant: (a) requested I to change the odometer of the JF car into the actual mileage indicated in the instrument board; and (b) I removed an electronic chips storing the odometer of the said vehicle, and then changed the odometer from 75,702 km to 55,767 km by the method of replacing the mileage of the said vehicle by the electronic chips purchased in advance.

In addition, the Defendant changed the mileage of 44 used cars through 44 times from that to December 5, 201, as indicated in attached Table 5.

2. On January 19, 2009, the defrauded concluded that the odometer indicated on the meter board was the actual odometer without notifying the victim L of the change in the odometer, as set forth in paragraph (1), at the “K” of Defendant’s operation, and without notifying the victim L of the change in the odometer as set forth in paragraph (1).

However, the actual odometer of the above vehicle was 50,939km.

The Defendant received 22,50,000 won from the victim as the purchase price for the vehicle from the seat.

In addition, the defendant is from that time as shown in the attached list 6.

arrow