1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Under the underlying facts, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in the evidence No. 1-8.

Plaintiff

A transferred KRW 10,00,000 to Defendant B on June 29, 2015, KRW 20,000, and KRW 20,000,000 to Defendant D corporation as the representative of Defendant B on December 31, 2015 and February 3, 2016, KRW 10,000,000 to Defendant B on May 9, 2016, and KRW 20,000,000 to Defendant C corporation as the representative of Defendant B on June 20, 2016, and KRW 10,000,000 and KRW 11,00,000,000 to each of the Defendants bank accounts on September 12, 2016.

B. On November 2016, Plaintiff Vienc General Construction Co., Ltd. concluded a contract with Defendant D for the removal of the existing building and new building located on the E and F ground (hereinafter “instant construction”) and for design services, and paid KRW 100 million as the construction cost on November 2, 2016.

However, the above Corporation was suspended in around 2017.

2. Assertion and determination

A. The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) The plaintiff corporation, as a director of the above plaintiff Eul, lent a sum of KRW 110 million to the above defendant's personal funds or the defendant corporation C and the defendant corporation D's operating expenses at the request of the above defendant Eul, and the defendants are obligated to pay each of the above plaintiff to the above plaintiff. 2) The plaintiff corporation non-NC Construction paid KRW 100 million to the defendant corporation in relation to the construction of this case, but the construction was suspended due to the reasons such as the above defendant's failure to properly perform the construction, and thus, the contract was cancelled by delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case and the return of KRW 24,337,120, excluding the part that the defendant corporation D actually spent in relation to the construction of this case.

B. Determination 1 on the claim for loans against the Defendants by Plaintiff A Co., Ltd.