1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 28, 2014, at around 6:20, the Plaintiff 663, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff is currently in hospitalized treatment as at the time when suffering from injury, such as cerebral cerebral cerebralop.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings]

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion that the accident in this case occurred not only due to the plaintiff's negligence but also due to the negligence of failure to perform his duty of care before the driver of the defendant's vehicle in this case, and the ratio of the above B's liability for the accident in this case exceeds 30%. (2) According to the defendant's terms and conditions, the defendant states that in the case of injury caused by his personal injury, even if the amount after offsetting the negligence falls short of the amount corresponding to the medical relationship cost, the defendant is obliged to compensate for the amount equivalent to the treatment relation cost (including the patient food for the hospitalized patient). Thus, as long as the defendant's insured vehicle B driver is responsible for the accident in this case, the defendant is obliged to pay the amount corresponding to the treatment relation cost amount to the plaintiff according to the above terms and conditions. (c) The defendant's assertion that the accident in this case occurred before the plaintiff's negligence.

B. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of the verification of CCTV taken the instant accident, the instant accident was committed by the Plaintiff who invadeds the central line and left the left.