Text
1. The plaintiffs' lawsuits against defendant E are dismissed.
2. Defendant E is the president of the Defendant FC Operation Committee.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant Francing Association (hereinafter “Defendant Franc Association”)
) The H market Fdong located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”).
) The first floor (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).
(2) The Plaintiff A is a non-corporate body established by 64 merchants who conduct business in a separate store to protect their rights from the co-ownership right holders of the instant commercial building. The Defendant Operational Body has a consultative body comprised of the consultative body and an election commission for the management of the election of the president of the Defendant Operational Body, etc. in order to carry out business activities, such as planning and establishing major tasks of the Defendant Operational Body.
Defendant E is an auditor of the Defendant Operation Committee and a consultation member, and was appointed as the second president of the Defendant Operation Committee on March 20, 2015.
B. 1) The election commission affiliated with the Defendant Operational Association, including the publication of the election for the president of the Defendant Operational Association, etc., is the election commission for the president of the Defendant Operational Association in March 3, 2015 (hereinafter “instant election”).
(2) On March 19, 2015, Defendant E recommended I who was the chairman of the Defendant Operation Association at the time of the election commission of the Defendant Operation Association and demanded the resignation of the Plaintiff C’s election management member by asserting that “The Plaintiff C, who was the election management member, recommended I who was the chairman of the Defendant Operation Association at the time of the election management member, could not manage the election fairly by recommending I as the chairman, and openly slandering Defendant E,” and demanding the resignation of the Plaintiff C’s election management member by asserting that “The Plaintiff C, as the election management member, recommended the resignation of the chairman at the time of the election management member at the time of the election management member at the time of the election management member.”
3. On March 20, 2015, Defendant E’s election management members at the election commission of Defendant E at the election commission of Defendant E will perform important duties to perform election affairs to be clearly selected by the chairman of Defendant E’s operating council. As such, Defendant E’s key views are as follows.