Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 12, 2016, between 04:50 and 05:10, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) while drinking alcohol at the main point of “D” located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City from August 12, 2016 to 05:10; (b) after receiving a 112 report that there is a minor, the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Gwanak Police Station E-gu Seoul Gwanak Police Station E-gu who called “the minor is a minor; and (c) caused the police officer to verify the identification card of a woman who is unable to know the name of another table.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the above restaurant operator and the police officer performing official duties due to the malfunction, etc.

2. At around 05:29 on August 12, 2016, the Defendant refused to request identification from the horse F at the same place as the above, and expressed his or her motive to F, expressed his or her identification card, and was arrested as a flagrant offender on the fourth floor as a result, he or she was arrested as a flagrant offender. On the patrol vehicle, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, thereby taking the f head in his or her hand. After having arrived at the E zone of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant committed assault by assaulting the F in his or her hand, i.e., taking the face, g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of crimes of F and arrest of flagrant offenders, who are police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A list of investigation reports (verification of a list of 112 reported cases) and that of dealing with 112 reported cases;

1. The victim photograph and field photograph defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, according to the above evidence, the defendant's drinking to a certain extent at the time of the crime of this case is true.