The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (a year and six months of imprisonment, a year of imprisonment and a fine of 300,000 won, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined that the Defendant was already subject to multiple juvenile protective disposition and criminal punishment for various crimes such as fraud in the past, but again committed each of the crimes in this case, and that the Defendant appears to have committed the crimes, and that the Defendant was aware of and divided into the facts of the crimes, the following circumstances, and all of the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, size of business and circumstances before and after

[2018Kadan2962] Crimes of the judgment of the court below [20Kadan847] and Article 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) committed by the defendant at the Daegu District Court on August 28, 2015, despite the fact that the defendant was punished by a fine of three million won, repeated crimes of the same kind of crime are not short of the operating period (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, etc.). The crime of the crime of the crime of the 2020Kadandan8471, 200 which the defendant assisted and assisted by the defendant, by misrepresenting his employees of financial institutions, is serious harm and injury to society as well as individuals, and requires strict punishment against the participants; the defendant inform Bosing Bosing staff of his account number; the defendant did not withdraw the remaining amount of damage to the defendant's account from 20 years to 300,000 won; the defendant did not withdraw it from the account.