1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the application of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each "B", "B", "B", and "B" of the 2nd 15th 15th , shall be applied to each "Defendant".

B. From 3th to 9th 8th 9th 8, “A evidence (the authenticity may be recognized in full view of the following facts: evidence 5, Eul evidence 2-2; evidence 2-2 of the witness J’s testimony)” means evidence 1 (a copy of the lease contract, the defendant denies the authenticity of the Defendant’s seal image part, or denies the authenticity of the document written in the Defendant’s name without authority, as it denies the authenticity of the document written in the Defendant’s name, etc., which was written in the Defendant’s name. Accordingly, in full view of the following facts, H directly establishes the seal under the Defendant’s name, which was issued by the Defendant with authority to enter into the lease contract on subparagraph 5, Eul’s witness 5-2, and Eul’s testimony, and part of the party witness H’s testimony, H may directly establish the lease contract on subparagraph 5 and affix the seal to the Defendant’s name, or it can be recognized that J has written the instant lease contract by allowing J to affix it to the lease contract.”

(c) from 4th to 21th day of the 4th page, the phrase “Inasmuch as the above exchange contract has been legally rescinded due to D’s default,” it shall be written by read as “the above exchange contract is null and void or has been rescinded by law due to D’s default.”

The first 10 to 13 acts are as follows: “In this case, first, the lease contract of this case is a false conspiracy, and there is only the testimony of the witness of the trial court as evidence that seems to be consistent with the above, and H is a conclusion of the lease contract of this case from the defendant.