The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2019, at around 02:45, the Defendant was punished for the victim and the trial expenses due to the delay in the departure of the taxi after the victim C was aboard the taxi driving by the Defendant.

When the victim, who gets off from the taxi by hand, assaults the defendant's neck by hand, and the defendant pusheds the defendant's face by hand from the taxi, etc., the defendant assaulted the defendant. The defendant, against the above act, assaulted the victim, such as plucking, plucking, plucking, etc., and assaulted the victim with approximately 14 days of treatment, and inflicted bodily injury such as salt, tension, etc. in detail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. An investigation report (in relation to attachment of a medical certificate for injury, a report on the confirmation of a taxi booms);

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended of sentence;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the victim was placed at the time of trial against the victim's assault, and the crime was committed, the victim was committed, the victim was not serious, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive and means of the crime, and consequences) of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14899, Apr. 1, 2009) of the suspended sentence of sentence, the defendant and defense counsel did not use the same assault as stated in the facts charged, and the victim attempted to spread to the victim's humf to escape from it. Thus, the defendant's act does not constitute violence

The Court is legally authorized by this Court.