A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defluencing the Defendant: (a) was passing ahead of the water dives tower located in the middle of Sinsi-ro 221 at the early January 7, 2017, and was under the control of vehicles not mandatory insurance at that place; (b) C and D with the background leading to the district unit of the initial police station B; and (c) Police Officer D, “Phoch flue bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.”

6 6 64

Ministry of Home Affairs during the performance of public duties

병신 같은 새끼! 뭘 꼴아 봐 하던 일 해 개새끼야! 한번만 더 부르면 우리 아빠 부른다 개새끼야! 씨 발 놈 공권력 좆같네

C. The victims were openly insulting, while there are many citizens, such as the so-called the so-called “Woo Hawh”, which means the so-called “Woo Hawh”.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, and place, asked personal information to the said C in order to bring the Defendant into a crime of insult, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the investigation by assaulting C, by holding the said C, i.e., taking the said person’s chest back one time to drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Complaint;

1. Statement made by the police preparation in relation to D and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment to images);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the factors such as Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.