logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.13 2019고단1413
특수상해
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2019, at around 02:55, Defendant B, at the main point of “D” in the name of “A” in Gwangju Northern-gu, where a dispute occurred while drinking alcohol together with the victim A, Defendant B suffered bodily injury, such as: (a) the victim’s breath while drinking alcohol with the victim; (b) the victim’s breath face; (c) the victim was satched; (d) the victim was satched; (e) the victim was satched; and (e) the victim was satched after the victim was satched; and (e) the victim was able to take part in the treatment unsatisfy and the right hand, and then take part in the course of a degree after a fating surgery.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), had the victim’s head part of the victim’s head cut once, and had the victim teared the treatment days, on the ground of beer disease, which is a dangerous object against the victim B’s above assault. Defendant A suffered bodily injury, such as having the victim teared the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Photographs of each damaged part of the suspect;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (suspects each side part and refusal to submit a diagnosis report);

1. Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) A of the Criminal Act: Defendant B: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is committed by the Defendants, who are the four-way ex post facto mar line, both of whom drinks, and Defendant B assaulted Defendant B without any discrimination, and Defendant A used the head of Defendant B as beerer disease at the price of the head of Defendant B, thereby causing each injury. Thus, the nature of the crime is not weak.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendants recognized the defendants' errors and reflects them, and that the punishment of the other party is not imposed by mutual agreement, the punishment shall be determined as ordered.

arrow