beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A On May 22, 2019, the Busan District Court has been sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Dong Branch of the Busan District Court for one year and two months, and for the same year.
9.17 The above judgment became final and conclusive.
[2019 Highest 2369]
1. Defendant A, using a mobile phone, put up a notice on the Internet car page or blobb, stating that “I will be able to remedy up to 1-7 degrees of credit rating” on the Internet car page or blobb, and throw away from the name of the person reporting this notice and communicating, then selling the provisional product at a low price of about 60 to 70% of the market price, which was delivered to the Defendant’s domicile or the address of the purchaser of rental products, and then selling the remaining sales price after deducting the fee from the fee at a low price of about 60 to 60% of the market price, is delivered to the said siren’s owner.
“The loan applicant, who requires electricity, has concealed a household product under his/her name and received a loan from a credit service provider as a collateral, and the credit service provider was bound by the name of the siren and the purchaser of the siren to acquire a sirened household product by means of “a new illegal loan method to dispose of the household product and recover the loan”.
On January 9, 2019, the Defendant sent a copy of the driver’s license from E who wants to “in-house relief loan” at the Defendant’s house located in the Busan Suwon-gu D, and sent a false statement that “I will faithfully pay rental fees every month for the 39-month period on delivery to an employee who calls at the call center of the victim FF corporation, and calls at the call center of the victim FF corporation, and calls at the call to the call center as E and calls for a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant, who lost a siren in the name of E, directly delivers home appliances to C, a purchaser of home appliances, received the purchase price from C, and paid some of them as a loan to E.