Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a BCA10V 105 108c motor under his/her name as his/her duties.

On June 30, 2018, the above Defendant driven the above engine around 10:45 on June 30, 2018, and proceeded on the back road in the direction of the academic affairs in which the side road is set from D to D.

At this point, the motor is one-way road in which entry is prohibited in the direction of passing, and the place of accident is a road in the form of an intersection without signal, and the accident occurred at a point out of the one-way road.

In such cases, there is a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving motors should not enter the place where entry is prohibited.

Nevertheless, the above defendant's negligence without neglecting the above duty of due diligence, which led to a collision with the front wheels part of the bicycle driven by the victim E (13 tax and South) who was driven by the bicycle lane from the right side of the motor's running direction to the left side of the motor.

Ultimately, the above Defendant left the scene without taking any measures, even though he/she suffered injuries, such as the damage of his/her son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate or an investigative report;

1. Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Selection of fines concerning the crime

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the confinement of a workhouse (the defendant and his/her defense counsel gave contact information to the victim, thus there was no intention of escape; and thus, they did not intend to escape;

The argument is asserted.

On June 30, 2018, the defendant is recognized as having given contact information of the defendant after causing a traffic accident, but is a minor on the same day.