All appeals filed by prosecutors and defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Considering the fact that the Defendant, who had been subject to multiple criminal punishment, including punishment for the same type of crime as this case by the prosecutor, committed the instantless erosion crime at all without being aware of the fact that he/she was committed during the period of repeated crime, the sentence imposed by the court below (3 million won of a fine) is too uneasible and unfair.

B. In view of the fact that the Defendant committed all of the instant crimes, and against the wrongness of the Defendant, and the treatment of alcohol respect in the future, the above punishment sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the above circumstances asserted by the prosecutor and the Defendant, the lower court appears to have determined the sentence by fully taking into account the following factors. In so doing, the lower court’s sentence is too somewhat somewhat less complicated in light of all the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, health, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., including the fact that there is no special change in circumstances that need to change the sentence after the sentence of

It is not likely that it is improper or uneasible.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition