logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단1299
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the part concerning the suspect among the facts charged (2) [Provided, That (1) the suspect is a suspect A; (2) the suspect is a defendant]; (3) the prosecutor held that the above facts charged were charged by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995); and (4) the summary order subject to review was notified and confirmed.

In this regard, after the above summary order has become final and conclusive, when an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the business of the corporation, Article 86 of the above Act shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

“The part “” was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court Decision 14,15,21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) rendered on October 28, 2010 by the Constitutional Court.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment in this case is publicly announced pursuant to Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.

arrow