A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2016, at around 21:15, the Defendant recommended that E in the situation where the police box affiliated with the Busan Sinan Police Station D, dispatched after receiving a report on a disturbance under the influence of alcohol on the front of the “C” located in Busan Sinan-gu, Busan, to return home, and the Defendant Hamb, “C shots and the police marbs since they had to go home.”

Dr. Doz. Doz.

“Chinging and verbal abuse,” and assaulting E face three times in drinking, and cutting off the right bucks to the right bucks of E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. Each statement protocol with respect to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment] The execution of imprisonment shall be postponed in consideration of the following: (a) there is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] there is no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (b) there is no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; and (c) there is no reflective nature.