The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (1.5 million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is based on the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, i.e., the confession of the instant crime, the Defendant’s violation of his mistake, the degree of injury to the victim, and the fact that the instant taxi is subscribed to the mutual aid association.

However, in full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant had a criminal record for the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant was negligent in operating a taxi in violation of the signal at the intersection; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the process and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s wrongful assertion of sentencing is groundless

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.