logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.19 2016노789
친환경농어업육성및유기식품등의관리ㆍ지원에관한법률위반
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (a fine of KRW 1.5 million is imposed on the Defendants) imposed by the lower court on the Defendants.

2. The judgment of the Defendants properly acknowledged and against the Defendants’ mistake, and that Defendant A intentionally did not seem to have committed the instant crime, and that the Defendants did not seem to have obtained huge economic benefits from the instant crime, and that Defendant A was an initial offender who did not have any previous criminal record.

On the other hand, there is no change in circumstances that may be considered newly after the pronouncement of the judgment below, and the court below seems to have determined the punishment by reducing the fine pursuant to the summary order in consideration of the above favorable circumstances. In addition, comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the background of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime in this case, the age and character of the defendant A, character and environment, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendants' assertion

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow