Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,00,000 by the Seoul Central District Court to a fine for a violation of road traffic law, and on April 20, 2007, the Seoul Central District Court issued a fine of KRW 2 million due to a violation of road traffic law.

On January 6, 2018, at around 02:44, the Defendant driven B-low-income vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.084% from the 1km section of approximately 1k to the front distance, from the 16-day lux of the same lux of water from the vicinity of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Themlu basin to the same lux of water.

As a result, the Defendant violated this more than twice even though he was unable to drive a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and once again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A certificate of drinking alcohol measurement, a report on the circumstances of the driver involved in drinking, and a report on the detection of the driver involved;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry statements, investigation reports (formers and confirmations) and Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The third round of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant shall be punished by a fine, taking into account the favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, taking into account the following factors: (a) it is not good for the Defendant to be controlled by driving under the reason of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act three times; (b) the drinking level is relatively high; and (c) the previous crime of drinking has

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.