beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal
2. The lower court: (a) took into account (i) the favorable circumstances in which the Defendant agreed with the victims regarding the crimes set forth in the 2017 senior group 76 (the obstruction of duties and the damage of property) into account the fact that the Defendant had been subject to punishment several times due to the same kind of crime; and (ii) takes into account the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (iii) the sentencing conditions set forth in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., within the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines; and (iv) simultaneously with the crime set forth in the 2017 senior group 84 (the crime set forth in the 2017 senior group 84) of the Road Traffic Act (the crime set forth in the 2017 senior group 2017 senior group 84), taking into account the sentencing conditions set forth in the records, such as equity in the case of the Defendant, the Defendant’s age, the environment, motive, means and consequence
The grounds for unfair sentencing (the background of each crime, confession, reflectivity, economic difficulty, and dependent) alleged by the Defendant appears to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the Defendant by the lower court, and the compulsory auction of real estate in the land and building on the land owned by the Defendant at the request of the victim of the fraud is underway, and the above sentencing conditions change even if considering the fact that the amount of fraud is partially included by the lender, even though it is considered that the above sentencing conditions change.
It is difficult to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the court below's punishment is determined reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.
Defendant
The argument is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.