1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On July 22, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a case in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) against the Plaintiff and made a false statement against his/her memory (hereinafter “instant perjury”) in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu District Court No. 364, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 364, as a witness of the case in question.

(2) On February 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won for perjury by the Daegu District Court (Tgu District Court 2015 High Court 2015 High Court 1994) and appealed thereon, but was sentenced to an dismissal judgment by the Daegu District Court on August 26, 2016 (Tgu District Court 2016No808). (2) On November 9, 2015, the Defendant submitted a written accusation against the Plaintiff to the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office.

(hereinafter “instant Defendant’s accusation.” On March 30, 2016, the Plaintiff was dismissed from the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office on the ground that it is evident that the Plaintiff was not guilty of a crime.

B. 1) The Plaintiff filed a complaint or accusation against the Defendant as follows (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s accusation”).

(A) On June 14, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Daegu Pacific Police Station by interfering with or threatening the Defendant’s business.

B) On December 28, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant without prejudice, and the Defendant was subject to a disposition by the Daegu District Prosecutor’s Office of Public Prosecutor’s Office to dismiss the Defendant, and on January 17, 201, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant to interfere with his/her business. The Defendant was subject to a disposition by the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office on January 17, 201 that he/she was not suspected (Evidence of Evidence). On July 8, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for a ruling on non-prosecution disposition with the Daegu District Court (Tgu District Court Decision 2011 Elementary District Court Decision 201Da137). The Plaintiff filed a new complaint with the Daegu Northern District Police Station, and the Defendant again filed a new complaint with the Defendant on September 29, 2011, but the Defendant had no suspicion from the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office on January 17, 2011 (Evidence of Evidence).