A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a Chinese national.

1. On July 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim’s instant act of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults, etc. of Drivers); (b) on the roads in front of the Sinsan Industrial High School located in 404, Y5 Taxi-ro, Singu, Sinsan Industrial High School (Seoul High School); and (c) on the backward seat of the victim E-5 taxi; and (d) on the road in front of the Sinsan High School, which was located in 404, to put up the victim’s gate, the destination, “Sari-ro, Sinnam-si, Sari-si, Sari-si,

Accordingly, when the victim D stops the above taxi on the right side, the defendant d knife and act as if he were to be the roadway, and the victim D knifedd by the victim D and prevented the defendant, and knife the police, knife the above taxi on the driver's seat of the above taxi, and knife the driver's seat of the victim, and knife the above taxi in the market price of 20 million won, which is the traffic of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim D, who is the driver of a vehicle in operation, and stolen the victim's traffic goods.

2. On July 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven the said taxi under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling on the face from the 128 in Ansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, annsan-si, to the 56th road, with red coloring on the face, at around 13:10 on July 23, 2016;

The same month as there are reasonable grounds for recognition.

4. From 00:50 to 01:20, at the police station of the Nansan-si Police Station located in the 14-20-ro 14-20, the above police box was requested by the police officer belonging to the above police box to respond to the measurement of drinking four times for about 30 minutes, while the police officer requested the above police box to respond to the measurement of drinking.

As a result, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to photograph the instant case (CCTV image faculing)

1. Criminal facts;