logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.12.12 2017고단4122
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2017, the Defendant, at around 00:00, carried out physical fighting with D and c with D after drinking alcohol at the front of the "C" located in Daejeon U.S. B, the Defendant: (a) on the road in front of the same company; and (b) on the same day, after receiving a report of 112 stating that "two male persons wrap", the Inspector F belonging to the Daejeon U.S. E District Police Station, called the Defendant, tried to listen to the circumstances of the case after separating D, and then listen to the case, (b) the f’s chest of F, in both hands, and “A bit bit bit bit bit f,” and (c) the Defendant was identical to a bit bit f.

“The Ba-gu, F, upon the request of the re- cooperation, said F, and at the same time, the Ba-gu, f, was tightly sealed once, and the F’s face was displayed once.

Defendant continued to display his arms, as the above D was put in place, and she was removed from E District G, and Defendant 1 placed his clothes cited as “Y, Y, E,” with G lapsing G, intending to have the lusent dancing of G, and sprinked three times in a short state.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of obstructing the execution of official duties in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not only impeding the function of the state’s legal order and order, such as nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority, but also constituting a serious crime that requires strict punishment.

However, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind and has been punished for a single-time crime, and has no criminal record of the crime recognized and has caused his/her mistake.

arrow