logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.22 2016구합20342
일반게임제공업 허가 취소 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is running a general game providing business in a mutual game room with the trade name, “C Gameland” located in Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant game room”).

B. From July 9, 2015 to August 14:10, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) installed a total of 140 game products that can play a game in the instant game site, such as scam, Alphac, alphac, alphac, Scradity 3, and ice ice (hereinafter “instant game”); (b) notified the Defendant of the fact that he/she was discovered to the police officer belonging to the Daegu Provincial Police Agency on the ground that he/she: (c) paid the points obtained through the use of the game to customers who find the place as 10,000 ccam (10,000 won per cam) on the game screen; and (d) granted an exchange value on the game screen to enable customers to receive a new game; and (d) notified the Defendant of the fact that he/she was discovered to the police officer belonging to the Daegu Provincial Police Agency on the ground that customers could sell cam to other customers.

C. On December 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in violation of Article 28 Subparag. 2 of the former Game Industry Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 13955, Feb. 3, 2016; hereinafter “Game Industry Act”); (b) caused the Plaintiff to engage in gambling and other speculative acts; or (c) abandoned the Plaintiff to engage in such gambling and other speculative acts; (d) Article 35(2)5 of the Game Industry Act; (b) Article 26(1) and [Attachment 5] of the former Enforcement Rule of the Game Industry Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism No. 256, May 3, 2016; hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the Game Industry Act”).

Pursuant to Paragraph 2, the revocation of permission for a general game providing business as of December 24, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) shall be made (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

D. D.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Daegu Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission, and the Daegu Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a written ruling on December 24, 2015.

arrow