1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,950,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from August 13, 2016 to June 14, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a person who is engaged in the manufacturing business of gold and sprinking, etc. with the trade name of C, and the defendant is a person who runs the manufacturing business with the trade name of D.

B. On December 20, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract with the Defendant for manufacturing and supplying the gold paper (Retler and two punishments) to the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). C.

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

1. Name of a contract: Cases of making gold-type (excluding reter and 2 punishment) with a motor vehicle platform;

2. Contract amount: 31 million won (excluding value-added tax);

3. Term of contract: From December 21, 2015 to January 6, 2016, Article 1 (Advanced Money) (1) of the Act on January 6, 2016, “A” (referring to the Plaintiff) shall settle 50% of the advance payment so that B (referring to the Plaintiff) may smoothly engage in gold production.

Article 2 (Payment Date) (1) B shall be supplied after completion of the gold-type contract concluded with A during a contract period.

(2) If weak parts are remaining or errors occur, Eul shall make them correct the best possible parts.

(c) B shall submit 10 sets of current events and products of both products after completion of gold production;

Article 3 (Minimum Closing Materials) (1) B shall request completion when it is produced under the conditions desired by A.

(2) After making a request to B, A shall confirm and determine whether to grant approval.

If the quality is appropriate for A’s request, A shall pay the balance.

[50% of the remaining amount shall be 6 months after completion of approval (180 days)];

D. On January 6, 2016, the Plaintiff produced a prototype and submitted a prototype to the Defendant by using gold-type design drawings, etc. provided by the Defendant (hereinafter “gold-type”).

E. After that, the Plaintiff revised the instant gold punishment several times according to the Defendant’s request for correction of the gold punishment, and on February 15, 2016, delivered the instant gold punishment to the Defendant.

F. In addition to the contract amount of this case 34.1 million won (including value-added tax), the sum of 5.390,000 won (including value-added tax) for the amendment and parts processing of the gold of this case is added.