logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.06 2018고정950
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2018, the Defendant driven a car as a business of B around 18:00, and driven a road near Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, along the four-lanes from the right side of the lake to the four-lane distance in the straight park.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes so as to ensure career safety.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the duty of care in the front place by neglecting it and neglected to do so, and the electric telegram installed in the news report is shocked with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and thus, the electric telegram cost exceeded the house near the vehicle, thereby causing an accident requiring approximately KRW 2,319,895 for restoration expenses, but left the site without taking necessary measures at the time of the occurrence of the traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual conditions, on-site photographs of accidents, and construction expenses specification;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (unmeasures and fines after Accidents) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the background leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident and the criminal fact leading up to the Defendant’s failure to take measures after the accident, etc. of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the amount of fine for summary order alone is deemed to be insufficient to achieve the purpose of punishment against the Defendant. Therefore, it is inevitable to increase the fine based on Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow