logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.09.25 2019고단1733
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 28, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a passenger car in B SP land.

On July 5, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.071% of blood alcohol concentration on July 5, 2019, and proceeded one lane in front of D in Gyeonggi Gwangju City at a speed of about 30 km from the inventory side to E in the direction of E.

It is a road with frequent traffic, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation of the front bank and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found that the victim F (the 50-year-old 50-year-old string of the victim F (the 50-year-old string) driven at the same lane while under the influence of alcohol was delayed, and concealed the backer of the damaged vehicle to the front driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, and due to the shock, the said strawing vehicle led to the following H driver’s H driver’s stex driver’s vehicle stopped on the front side.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence to the victim F.

2. Although the Defendant was under the influence of punishment for drunk driving as above, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle for the stimul concerned from the trade name in front of the non-cafeteria cafeteria located at the GJ in Gwangju-si to the front of the same city in the same city, at the time and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.071%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual survey report and the diagnosis report;

arrow