logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단3762
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 2018, the defendant should accumulate the transaction performance in order to implement the loan because he/she has no transaction performance in the passbook.

The phrase “if money is deposited in the account of the Party, to withdraw the money in cash and to deliver it to an unsatisfy employee” was heard, and the above date was known as illegal, and then the name unsatfyer was notified of the Defendant’s B account under the name of the Defendant.

After that, on April 5, 2018, the person in whose name the victim was not injured by phone called to the victim C on April 5, 2018 and misrepresented to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Dental Inspection, and "the account opened in the name of the victim was connected to the crime related to the Grand passbook, so it is necessary to conduct an investigation.

In order to protect the account, the money in E refers to the Financial Supervisory Service’s transfer to the virtual account, which would be restored to its original condition after the investigation is completed, and the victim was forced to transfer KRW 32 million to the B account in the name of the defendant around 12:36 of the same day.

On the other hand, the Defendant, at around 13:34 of the same day, withdrawn 32 million won, which was transferred to B account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, in the vicinity of the Ma apartment apartment street B, around the same day, according to the direction of the person who was not entitled to the name, and then, deposited 15 million won in cash at the F bank located in the exit area of 3 Doe-dong, the check was changed to 17 million won in cash at the G bank located in the Doe-dong of the same Doe-dong, and after converting 17 million won in cash from the G bank located in the Doe-dong of the F bank to 17 million won in cash after converting Doe-dong of the same Gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided the account to the person who was unaware of his name with the knowledge that he committed the crime of fraud, and provided it by withdrawing and delivering the money acquired by the person who was unaware of his name, thereby facilitating the fraud of the person who was unaware of name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A new protocol;

arrow