1. The plaintiffs' lawsuit of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 11:

(1) On October 3, 1917, the circumstances of the land and the division and registration relationship (E, characters F) were examined as follows: (a) G forest 5,851 square meters; (b) G forest 5,851 square meters before subdivision; (c) 357 square meters before subdivision; (d) I123 square meters before subdivision; (c) and (d) Yangju-si, Jin forest Do.

(2) The real estate located over G forest 5,851 square meters in the Gu government prior to the division and registration relationship (A) was divided into G forest 5,533 square meters, K forest 175 square meters, L forest 79 square meters, and M forest 64 square meters. The said divided G forest 5,533 square meters was again subdivided into G forest 4,98 square meters and N forest 535 square meters.

The said divided G forest 4,98 square meters (hereinafter “electric field 1 real estate”) was again divided into 1,081 square meters in O forest, 1,106 square meters in P forest, Q forest 912 square meters in Q forest, 586 square meters in R forest, 243 square meters in S forest, 730 square meters in T forest, 1,534 square meters in U forest, and registration conversion.

(B) The instant real estate with the land category of 357 square meters prior to H prior to the subdivision was divided into V, 306 square meters and H large 51 square meters (hereinafter “former real estate 2”). The said V large 306 square meters was combined into the said K forest land and 175 square meters, L forest and 79 square meters, M forest and 64 square meters, and W road 713 square meters.

(C) Before registration conversion, the above real estate of 123 square meters was divided into X large 407 square meters (hereinafter “former 3 real estate”), X large 136 square meters and Y large 271 square meters.

(D) When the official cadastral record of the previous land of this case, where the registration relation E was assessed, was destroyed due to the incident of 6.25 incidents, the registration of preservation of ownership was made as the receipt No. 9562 on August 11, 1972, after the revised registration was completed on July 20, 1972 by the non-party Z (E’s grandchildren and AAE’s 3 South-Nam)’s name and address restored to the owner on the old forest and land cadastre.

After that, AB (the south of AC) is the District Court No. 23904 received on December 21, 1978 with respect to the land of this case.