logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.16 2015누31932
압류처분무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The second face "94,736,230 won" in the parallel 8 shall be deemed to be "94,874,230 won".

(2) Part 4, Paragraph 2, the “E” shall be improved to “G”.

(3) The 4th parallel 6th parallels to 16th parallels are as follows:

[2) On October 2, 200, the head of Incheon District Tax Office issued a notice of tax payment of global income tax of KRW 1,819,440 (including additional taxes) for 197, around October 2, 200 on the premise that the Plaintiff is a business operator of the instant business, and the notice of tax payment of KRW 54,712,220 for global income tax of May 13, 2001 and KRW 5,471,220 for resident tax of KRW 5,471,220 for resident tax of 1996 was served to the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G, the Plaintiff’s domicile at each time by registered mail. On the other hand, on November 11, 2002, the head of Incheon District Tax Office notified the Plaintiff of the details of imposition of resident tax for 1996 from the head of Incheon District Tax Office to the Plaintiff on November 31, 2002, the Plaintiff and the head of Incheon District Court rendered a final judgment against the Plaintiff’s 23031 and 25.31.

"4 The defendant issued a reminder to the plaintiff on November 20, 200 with respect to global income tax and additional dues for the year 1997, and on June 19, 200, with respect to global income tax and additional dues for the year 1996, on June 19, 201, respectively, and issued a reminder to the plaintiff on October 26, 2004 and October 28, 2004 for the collection of the instant tax disposition.

arrow