Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

around 11:00 on June 7, 2017, Defendants c, D, and D, and E construction, expressed the victim F’s desire to pay the victim F with the victim’s wage. Defendant A, by hand, her batdd the victim’s face with her bat, twice the victim’s batd with her hand, and Defendant B batd the victim’s batd with the victim’s batd with her hand, and 2:3 times the victim’s batd with the victim’s batd with the batd with her hand, and C was pushed the victim’s batd with her fat, and D was pushed the victim’s batd with her hand, and her batd with the victim’s batd with the victim’s bat.

Accordingly, the Defendants assaulted the victim jointly with C and D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. As to Defendant B’s partial legal statement C, D, and F, the occurrence of a statement in F in each police interrogation protocol against Defendant B

1. Each internal investigation report (as regards attachment of E assault videos), investigation report (as regards Nos. 4 of evidence list, suspect F testimony, and CCTV image verification);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on assault against the victim, screen pictures and video CDs;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(2)1 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A had the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act before and after the same suspended execution.

Defendant

B has been punished for violent crimes several times, and on July 9, 2010, sentenced to five years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, etc.) and completed the enforcement (on May 2, 2010, the first detention) and committed a repeated crime again.

Such circumstances are disadvantageous to the Defendants.

However, this case was caused by Defendant B's participation in the situation where Defendant A had talked with the victim due to the overdue wage problem, and she had been made by mutual assault.