1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the explanation in this part of the facts of recognition are as follows, and the part of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the statements in the evidence No. 1 to No. 5 with the grounds for recognition as follows: therefore, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit against Plaintiff D et al. seeking compensation for damages under the Daejeon District Court Branch 2014Gahap4753. On December 4, 2015, the said court rendered a judgment ordering Plaintiff A to pay 28,290,300 won and delay damages therefrom for the tort of not notifying the Plaintiff while it was well aware that the indoor parking lot part of the instant indoor parking lot was illegal, and that D would incur damages equivalent to the premium and facility installation cost. In the instant case, the Daejeon High Court 2015Na1526, which is the appellate court of the instant case, KRW 200,000,000, and KRW 200,000,000 until December 31, 2017, KRW 200,000, KRW 3008,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the instant parking lot, which included the above settlement order.

Therefore, although D and the Prosecutor appealed to Daejeon District Court 2016No3570, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on October 19, 2017, which became final and conclusive on October 27, 2017.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is as follows: Defendant C is based on the previous drawings.