logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.16 2013고정1394
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be subject to a fine of KRW 1,000,000, KRW 2,000,000, KRW 300,000, Defendant C shall be subject to a fine of KRW 1,00,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants D, E, and C conspired with each other from around 19:00 on August 26, 201 to around 21:00, the Defendants held at the meeting of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Committee for Promotion of G Apartment Housing Improvement Project (hereinafter “Promotion Committee”) a promotion committee consisting of 100 members (6th), which is a resolution body at the promotion committee office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Promotion Committee for G Apartment Housing Improvement Project (hereinafter “Promotion Committee”) and the promotion committee members deliberated on the agenda of the Residents’ H, which is the promotion committee chairperson, despite the fact that they are not their own order of remarks, the Defendants were not the victim’s order of remarks in relation to the direction for or the operation of the Residents’ Assembly, but did not make a statement to the victim, or received money from the victim from the victim, and further Defendant E interfered with the deliberation of the agenda items and resolution of the promotion committee members including the victim by force for 2 hours in terms of spiting erosion, etc.

2. Defendant E, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C conspired with each other from around 16:10 to 20:00 on September 7, 201, the Defendants obstructed the deliberation and resolution on the agenda items of the promoters including the victim, by means of force of 3 hours and 50 minutes prior to the entrance of the promotion office, with the knowledge that the promotion committee (6th) with 100 persons, as set forth in paragraph (1), would hold a promotion committee (7th) around 19:0 on the same day in order to re-examine and resolve the agenda items which had not been handled at the time, and that the promotion committee would hold at around 19:0 on the same day in order to make it difficult for the promotion committee to attend the meeting.

3. Defendant E’s property is the property by spraying a black frame in an amount equivalent to KRW 450,00,000 of the market price of CCTV camera installed on the entrance and exit door at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), and KRW 3 million,000,000,000,000.

arrow