A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 through 6, 8, 9, 11 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall take over any means of access necessary for electronic financial transactions, except as otherwise provided for in other Acts;

Nevertheless, the Defendant under the direction of “D” to the effect that “I will receive goods from the designated address and deliver them to the address to which I designate them,” a single name, which is the organization of “Singing.”

A. At around 17:00 on May 26, 2015, the head of the Tong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City post office account (F) in the name of E from the front of 379 (Mamandong, Manman Apartment apartment).

(b) in the subway station located in Seoul on May 2015, opened a passbook and a check card, respectively, connected to G’s Korean Standards (H) and the bank account (I), from the person in default of name, in the subway station located in Seoul;

C. On June 2015, 2015, the Seocho-si University was opened a passbook with the post office account under the name of J (K) from the deceased deceased in front of the Cheongsan-si University’s Cheongsan-si.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the staff of phishing operations, such as “D”, acquired the means of access.

2. Computer, etc. user fraud is a management policy that solicits a passbook, e.g., a passbook connected to the account to be used in committing the scaming crime under the direction of the aforementioned “D”, which is the organization of the “scaming,” and the Defendant conspired to acquire money from the victim by misrepresenting himself/herself with the employees of the scaming, etc., such as the above “D,” with the prosecution.

On May 27, 2015, at around 10:27, 2015, the Defendant’s victim’s account number, cell phone number, etc. are entered by phone calls from the victim L, “Seoul Central District High-tech Criminal Investigation Team M. and N... ... Inasmuch as a passbook was opened due to the theft of the name of the party, and another person was damaged by others, the site of the prosecutor’s office is confirmed.” In short, the Defendant’s victim’s act of allowing the victim to enter account number, cell phone number, etc. by accessing the website of the fake Public Prosecutor’s Office.