A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1981"

1. On March 16, 2017, at around 03:50, the Defendant: (a) 03:50 on the roads of the Gyeonggi-si Si Sim-si, together with the victim D (53 years of age) where drinking alcohol was carried; (b) when drinking once, the victim’s face was obstructed; and (c) the victim’s fright and part of drinking water was walked on several occasions; and (d) the victim suffered injury, such as the victim’s fright to the treatment days, and fright to the treatment days.

2. On March 16, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the above place, around 04:10, and the Defendant arrested the Defendant on the grounds that the assistant F of the Suwon Police Station E Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report 112, arrested the Defendant on the ground of the facts constituting the above injury and the charges, and assault the said F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F, who was seated at the back seat of the patrol vehicle twice in front of the patrol.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

On June 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 00:15, around the main point of “H” located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) Doing the victim D (53 tax) to take a bath; (c) Doing the victim’s arms by hand; (d) Doing the victim’s arms by hand; and (e) Doing the victim’s hands with the victim’s hand, Doing the part of the victim’s her arm’s length.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1981"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, D, I, J, and K;

1. Photographs (F, D), on-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel did not inflict any injury on the victim D, and the defendant does not intend to do so to the police officer in the course of arrest, and there was no violence against the police officer. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant's testimony to the effect that each crime of the defendant is recognized without reasonable doubt, and the defendant's testimony to the effect that the defendant delayed 1 to 20 minutes at the bar above the victim D is insufficient to reverse the above fact, and there is no other counter-proof, the above argument is rejected).

"2017 Highest 4599"

1. The defendant's person;