A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 188]

1. On December 17, 2013, around 03:30 on December 17, 2013, the Defendant ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol to the victim from the “Ecarf” of the victim’s D management on the second floor in Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the victim because there was no money in water.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained the victim with a single branch of the two weeks equivalent to the market value of 2.60,000 won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

2. The Defendant damaged property by adding property owned by a non-victim of the market price to the victim, such as the date, time, place, and time as described in the above paragraph (1) above, the victim’s demand for payment of the drinking value, and going beyond the portion owned by the victim who was placed in the fluence, the damage was caused by cutting off the fluence using the partitions by drinking, and the damage was caused by cutting off the glass cup and the fluence on the table.

3. The Defendant engaged in the performance of official duties: (a) at the time, place, etc. mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant: (b) laid away a large glass balance on the table, without any justifiable reason, from the police officers dispatched to the police station upon receiving a report by 112, who did not pay the alcohol value as above; (c) and (d) laid off the table, without any justifiable reason, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of official duties and investigation by using violence, such as cutting back the table table on the table, booms, etc. to the police officers, and cutting the Defendant into a flagrant offender under suspicion of the obstruction of the performance of official duties; and (d) during the police officer’s movement, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender under suspicion of the obstruction of the performance of official duties by using force, such as “Ne h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

4. The Defendant damaged the article for public use at the time, place, as described in the above paragraph (3), and the patrol vehicle after arresting a flagrant offender as above.