logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.07.18 2018나58330
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff has been engaged in money transactions by borrowing and repaying money from the Defendant several times. The details of the relevant financial transactions and the preparation of cash borrowed money are as follows.

1) The details of the Plaintiff’s deposit from the Defendant (i) received KRW 5 million on April 9, 2004 from the Plaintiff to the passbook under the Plaintiff’s name (ii) received KRW 16 million on August 19, 2004 to the passbook in the name of the Plaintiff, and (iii) prepared a cash tea certificate (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant cash tea certificates”), 1 January 30, 2005, 200 won on January 30, 2005, as follows:

1. Date of payment: The interest agreement rate on July 30, 2005: the address of borrower on January 30, 2005: the address of borrower on January 5, 2005: The name: A (Plaintiff) (2) the cash car certificate and the 20,000,000 won car certificate as of February 20, 200; and

1. Date: The interest agreement rate on March 20, 2006: the address of the borrower on February 20, 2006: The name omitted: A (Plaintiff) and the name of the resident registration number Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (3) the loan certificate of August 30, 2006 and the above amount shall be paid in 100,000 won per month until April 30, 2008.

4. The details that the Plaintiff transferred to the Defendant on August 30, 2006, for monthly payment of KRW 6 million until 30,000,000 each month, for which the promise was made by October 14, 2005, and KRW 600,000 on October 14, 2005, KRW 300,000 on January 5, 2006, KRW 400,000 on May 27, 2006, KRW 60,000 on March 22, 2006, KRW 300,000 on April 24, 2006, KRW 60,000 on May 22, 2006, KRW 7,700,000 on May 31, 200,000.

B. On July 11, 2016, the Plaintiff prepared a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with the following content as a notary public No. 782 of the C Deed No. 2016:

A notarial deed of a monetary loan for consumption.

arrow